Our Work

Current Cases

Coalitions and Collaborations

Past Projects and Cases



Transportation


LA Bus Riders Union

On June 18, 2007 Public Advocates filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in Labor/Community Strategy Center v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority on behalf of the Strategy Center and the LA Bus Riders Union, which represents hundreds of thousands of low-income and minority Los Angeles bus riders. With our co-counsel at the firm of Howrey LLP, we appealed we appealed a lower court decision not to extend a previously issued Consent Decree and hold LA MTA in contempt for failing to make required improvements to bus service.

On May 5, 2009 a divided panel of the 9th Circuit ruled against extending federal jurisdiction over the consent decree that required the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority to expand bus service. The decision drew a powerful dissent from Judge Marsha Berzon.

Read the Appellants’ Opening Brief    Read the Appellant's Reply Brief     Opinion Filed May 5, 2009
Petition Filed May 26, 2009    More about LA BRU    The Strategy Center


Darensburg v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission

On April 19, 2005, Public Advocates and a coalition including bus riders, labor, and civil rights advocates filed a federal class action lawsuit against the Bay Area’s Metropolitan Transportation Commission on behalf of AC Transit bus riders of color. The suit alleges that MTC violates federal and state civil rights laws by channeling funds in favor of BART and Caltrain commuters while denying equitable funding to AC Transit bus riders of color.

Developments

  • The Court has scheduled closing arguments for December 16, 2008 at 1 p.m.
  • On October 22, 2008, Plaintiffs rested their case.
  • On October 1, 2008, Plaintiffs began presenting their case to the Court.
  • On April 1, 2008, Plaintiffs filed a motion asking the Court to rule that MTC's practice of failing to fund transit operating shortfalls has a discriminatory impact on minority bus riders.
  • The Court certified the case as a class action on December 10, 2007.
  • The Court set the case for an October 1, 2008 trial date.
  • We filed our Second Amended Complaint on November 1, 2007.

Background

MTC's discriminatory behavior is starkly reflected in the level of public subsidies it provides to transit users. BART and Caltrain passengers, who are disproportionately white and affluent, receive a per passenger subsidy of $6.14 and $13.79, respectively, for each trip they make. AC Transit riders on the other hand, 80% of whom are people of color and 60% of whom are transit dependent, receive a public subsidy of only $2.78. This race and subsidy chart depicts a graphic representation of the disparity.

The litigation seeks equity in the funding and services available for low-income transit-dependent riders of AC Transit. Plaintiffs include three individual AC Transit bus riders: Sylvia Darensburg of East Oakland, Vivian Hain of East Oakland, and Virginia Martinez of Richmond. Additional plaintiffs are Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) and the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 192. Representing plaintiffs with Public Advocates are Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein; CBE; and Altshuler Berzon Nussbaum & Demain.

Copies of Plaintiffs' court documents can be obtained through the link below. For additional information, please contact Richard Marcantonio at rmarcantonio@publicadvocates.org, or Guillermo Mayer at gmayer@publicadvocates.org.

Court documents

Reports and Articles

Report: Life and Death from Unnatural Causes: Health and Social Inequity in Alameda County. Produced with the help of Public Advocates Staff Attorney Guillermo Mayer, this chapter discusses transportation equity and health. Read the full report.

Article: "From the Back of the Bus to the End of the Line: The Discriminatory Funding of Public Transit in California" (American Bar Association Journal, Human Righs, Summer 2007, Volume 34, No. 3)

Report: MTC, Where are Our Buses? (Dec. 2006)

Article: "Bay Area Transit: Separate and Unequal" (Race, Poverty & the Environment, Dec. 2005)

Supporting Documents

Attorney General Comments on MTC's Notice of Preparation for Draft Environmental Impact Report (October 2008)

Letter by Bay Area Elected Officials Urging Equitable Funding from MTC (March 2007)

Resolution by Richmond City Council in Support of Equitable Funding for AC Transit Riders (November 2005)

Resolution by Oakland City Council in Support of Equitable Funding for AC Transit Riders (November 2005)

Letter by Bay Area Elected Officials Urging Equitable Funding from MTC (September 2005)

Resolution by Berkeley City Council in Support of Equity for AC Transit Bus Riders (July 2005)

Urban Habitat and the Transportation Justice Working Group asked MTC to conduct an analysis of the equity of its funding decisions, and critiqued MTC's inadequate analysis. Read the proposal and the critique.


Transportation Justice Campaigns

Urban Habitat, California ACORN and the Genesis grassroots/faith-based coalition are working to build a groundswell of support for fair transit funding and build an East Bay Bus Riders Union. They are also urging a Free Youth Bus Pass program. We are supporting them in this mission, as well as providing data to MTC’s Minority Citizens’ Advisory Committee.

Transit Riders for Public Transportation

On April 8, 2009 Public Advocates joined civil rights and environmental justice groups across the country in launching a national campaign targeting the Congressional reauthorization of the $500 billion Federal Surface Transportation Act (FSTA). The Transit Riders for Public Transportation (TRPT) campaign, coordinated by the Labor/Community Strategy Center in Los Angeles, calls on Congress to dramatically curb greenhouse gas emissions and meet the vital transit needs of low-income communities of color by dedicating 80% of federal funding to public transit and 20% to highway maintenance – a flip of the existing funding formula.

TRPT Campaign Website    TRPT Brochure    Transit & Job Creation  

Non-Discrimination in Transportation Spending

Genesis

On February 25, 2009 Genesis argued that federal stimulus money should be used to preserve current transit service
and jobs to help stave off a looming transit crisis, clergy, community leaders, transit advocates and bus riders, insisting that MTC Commissioners reject a staff plan diverting $70 million in federal stimulus money to a costly rail expansion project.    press release

On February 24, 2009 a letter was sent to Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) on behalf of Genesis and Urban Habitat urging the Commission to reject the proposal to divert $70 million in federal stimulus money needed for transit operations towards future expansion projects like BART to the Oakland Airport. Redirecting this money will cost hundreds of jobs in transit operations from route cut-backs and lead to severe rate hikes for those who depend on public transit to get to jobs, medical care, shopping, and schools.    letter    media advisory

Advocating at state and federal level

Court Strikes Down Raid of $1 Billion in Transit Funding

On June 30th, the California Court of Appeal, Third District, held that $1 billion in "spillover" gas tax revenues dedicated to public transportation by Proposition 116 may not be diverted by the California Legislature to the General Fund. (opinion)

This ruling is a significant victory for all Californians, and especially for low-income communities where transit services have been scaled back as a result, in part, of the misappropriation of funds that has now been found illegal.

Public Advocates represented the amici curiae in this case, Shaw v. Chiang, arguing on the side of the plaintiffs that the Legislature’s transfer of the "spillover" gas tax revenues was both illegal and bad public policy. (amicus brief). The amici are Urban Habitat, TransForm, the Los Angeles Bus Riders Union, the California Public Interest Research Group, the Planning and Conservation League, California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc., and Legal Services of Northern California.

Operating public transit service is a triple-win: it promotes social equity and access to economic opportunity for low-income and transit-dependent communities, while at the same time fueling economic growth and reducing carbon emissions.

The Legislature’s illegal diversion of “spillover” gas tax revenues contributed to a growing crisis facing transit operations that has resulted in unprecedented service cuts and fare hikes throughout California and nationally. In the San Francisco Bay Area alone, the operating deficits for BART, AC Transit, Muni and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority exceed $350 million.

Read a short piece we prepared for legislators on the need for transit operating funds.

If you would like more information on this important victory for public transportation and low-income communities in California, please contact Richard Marcantonio or Guillermo Mayer at (415) 431-7430.

Using Stimulus Funds to Mitigate Cuts to Local Transit Service (February 20, 2009)

Transportation & Infrastructure Committee statement (January 21, 2009)

Appropriations Committee statement (January 21, 2009)

White Paper: Preserving Transit Operating Funds in the State Budget (December 22, 2008)

White Paper: Why Transit Operating Funds are an Essential Component of a Successful Economic Recovery Package (December 19, 2008)

Youth Bus Pass

MTC Staff Report on Youth Bus Pass (July 2002)

Supervisors Carson and Gioia Request MTC Funds for Youth Bus Pass Pilot Program (July 2001)

 

Home | About Us | Our Work | News | Donate | Jobs | Resources | Contact Us |