Project: Campaign for Quality Education v. California

Press Advisory For Immediate Release: January 12, 2016

WHAT: Oral arguments in CQE v. State of California (and the related case, Robles-Wong v. CA)

WHERE: California State Court of Appeals, District 1, 350 McAllister St., San Francisco

WHEN: January 27, 2016 – 2:00 pm (PST)

WHO: Plaintiffs in the case include the Campaign for Quality Education (CQE), Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE), Californians for Justice (CFJ), San Francisco Organizing Project/Peninsula Interfaith Action (SFOP/PIA), and PICO California, plus more than 20 individual students and parents.

They are represented by Public Advocates Inc., a San Francisco-based public interest law firm and advocacy group that also served as a lead counsel in Williams v. California and Serrano v. Priest, as well as Arnold & Porter, and Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, two prominent national law firms serving as pro bono counsel.


On July 12, 2010, a coalition of groups and individuals representing thousands of low-income students and parents from across California sued the State of California, calling on the State to live up to its constitutional responsibility and “provide all California public school students with a new school finance system that sufficiently and equitably supports its public schools, so that every child has a reasonable opportunity to obtain a meaningful education that prepares them for civic, social, and economic success in the 21st century.”

The complaint in CQE v. California makes two main legal claims under the Education Clause of the California Constitution, which are under review on appeal:

  1. that the State’s school funding system prevents schools from providing children with their fundamental right to obtain an education that enables them to participate fully in our society’s economic and civic life, and
  2. that the school funding system violates the State’s duty to “keep up and support” a system of common schools by failing to support the delivery of the State’s adopted academic standards to students.

In the lawsuit, plaintiffs asked the court to declare the State’s current funding system unconstitutional and to order that a new one be created that aligns to the actual costs of preparing students for college and careers and to individual student needs.The lawsuit highlights the huge achievement gaps low-income students, English Learners and students of color suffer compared to their peers in California and the huge gaps all California students suffer compared to their peers in other states. In the five years since the complaint was filed, California students continue to lag behind their peers in nearly every other state on national math and reading assessments. The first round of the state’s new achievement test released last Fall shows California’s neediest students suffer from even larger achievement gaps under the state’s new Common Core standards than existed under the prior academic standards. These persistent gaps are not surprising given the State’s continued failure to invest the necessary resources in public education. Despite the passage of the finance reform Local Control Funding Formula in 2013—which only seeks to return the state to its 2007-08 level of education spending—California’s per pupil spending remains among the lowest in the nation (42nd) after adjusting for cost of living. As a result of its underinvestment, California continues to rank dead last in the nation in teacher to student ratios and last or close-to-last in other staff to student ratios.*

The Court of Appeals has consolidated the appeal of CQE v. California with a similar appeal in the Robles-Wong v. California case, filed in May 2010 by the California School Boards Association, the Association of California School Administrators, the California State PTA, and a number of individual plaintiffs. The two lawsuits are based on similar legal theories and share the same goal—to ensure California’s students are supported by the State’s school finance system so that they acquire a quality education and graduate career ready.


*Jonathan Kaplan, “California’s Support for K-12 Education Ranks Low by Almost Any Measure,” California Budget & Policy Center, November 2015

Isabel Alegria,, 415-431-7434, 510-541-5428;
John Affeldt,, 415-625-8484
Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt